โ RNS 1.4.2 released https://pypi.org/project/rns/
๐ฌค rns.recipes
top
โโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโ
โ Forum bug: "Reply" on nested citations leads to corruption of nested marks. โ
โโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโ
Started by dreieck ยท 2mo ago
โโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโ
post-1
โญโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโฎ
โ dreieck #1 โ
โฐโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโฏ
โธ 2mo ago
Ahoj,
I think I discovered an issue with (the web based version at least) the forum:
When I hit "Reply" on a post which already has citations, the second-level >
get replaced by > , and third level > get replaced
by > -- and > definitely will be
mis-rendered.
See for example in [this
thread](/forum/general/anyone-running-an-rf-only-reticulum-mesh-with-20-rnodes) the
message from @dreieck from 2026-05-28, which was generated by hitting the "Reply" button
on the message above and filling my content there.
Precisely:
Message I want to cite:
**welo** wrote:
> **Rob** wrote:
> > I was excited about the routing ability, but the more i dig into it, the more difficult it is
> May you expand on exactly what the difficulty is?
so I have a lab setup of nodeA and nodeB and "T" transport node. both A&B are connected to RNS and can communicate with each other. when I introduce T and the links are not symmetrical eg. A->T->B and the return path is B->A messages stall. If the return path is the same as the forward path it works. I read the logic where Mark mentions the announce as a indicator of the best path and load balancing, but It seems something is not working for me. so if A and B are totally isolated and T is in the middle everything works.
When I hit the reply on that message, I get:
**Rob** wrote:
> **welo** wrote:
> > **Rob** wrote:
> > > I was excited about the routing ability, but the more i dig into it, the more difficult it is
> >
> > May you expand on exactly what the difficulty is?
> >
> >
> >
> >
> so I have a lab setup of nodeA and nodeB and "T" transport node. both A&B are connected to RNS and can communicate with each other. when I introduce T and the links are not symmetrical eg. A->T->B and the return path is B->A messages stall. If the return path is the same as the forward path it works. I read the logic where Mark mentions the announce as a indicator of the best path and load balancing, but It seems something is not working for me. so if A and B are totally isolated and T is in the middle everything works.
>
Regards!
โ 0 โ 0 โค 0
โ INFO โ Identify to this node to post. How?
bottom